After many uses, I find TG8xhd2 better than TG8xft2. TG8xft2 gives a picture that is too smooth and elastic like a rubber band, because it removes the thin condom layer in the film. I want to test TG-Z415, has anyone ever compared TG-Z415 and TG8xhd2?
Hey,Bro! I actually see your workpieces and I preciate your great work. The conclusion that "TG8xft2 is better than TG8xhd2" is based on JP202(original), because I didn't use any other added SR tools
详情回复
发表于 2025-3-7 10:07
motbautroi 发表于 2025-3-7 03:31
After many uses, I find TG8xhd2 better than TG8xft2. TG8xft2 gives a picture that is too smooth and ...
Hey,Bro! I actually see your workpieces and I preciate your great work. The conclusion that "TG8xft2 is better than TG8xhd2" is based on JP202(original), because I didn't use any other added SR tools except 3XSR and SPAN4HD. But because these is JP300 and these are many complex settings, the conclusion may be different.
Zsural 发表于 2025-3-7 10:07
Hey,Bro! I actually see your workpieces and I preciate your great work. The conclusion that "TG8xf ...
I also use JVP 3.0d to run TG8xft2 and TG8xhd2. TG8xft2 erases some parts of the original image but does not recreate a new image with detail, it just smooths the image, so when using more enhancements it produces a very bad image with no detail. The funniest thing is when the actor is about to put on a thin condom but the condom is not visible.
[复制链接]
发表于 2025-2-1 17:13:36
楼主